Non-Destructive Testing

Rebound Hammer Test (Schmidt Hammer)

Rebound hammer testing to IS 13311 Part 2 — rebound numbers and estimated in-situ compressive strength for structural audits of buildings and bridges

NABL TC-14144 · ISO/IEC 17025:2017 · NHAI / PWD / BRO Approved · 24-72h Mobilisation
Request a Quote +91-82953-60108
IS 13311 Part 2 IS 456:2000 BS EN 12504-2

What is the rebound hammer test (IS 13311 Part 2)?

The rebound hammer (Schmidt hammer) test is a non-destructive test that estimates the surface compressive strength and uniformity of hardened concrete from the rebound number of a spring-loaded mass. It follows IS 13311 (Part 2) and is often combined with ultrasonic pulse velocity for structural assessment. NKMPV performs rebound hammer testing as a NABL-accredited laboratory.

The rebound hammer test (Schmidt hammer test) is a non-destructive method for estimating the in-situ compressive strength of hardened concrete by measuring the rebound number of a spring-loaded mass striking the concrete surface. It is one of the most widely used NDT techniques for rapid concrete quality assessment in India.

What Is the Rebound Hammer (Schmidt Hammer) Test?

Reviewed by NKMPV Technical Editorial Team, NABL Assessor, IS/IRC-Code Certified Engineers  ·  Last reviewed:

The rebound hammer test works on the principle that the rebound of an elastic mass striking a concrete surface is related to the surface hardness, which in turn correlates with the compressive strength of the concrete. A spring-loaded steel hammer impacts the concrete through a plunger, and the distance it rebounds is measured on a graduated scale as the rebound number (R). This value, typically ranging from 10 to 60, is then correlated to estimated compressive strength using conversion charts provided by the instrument manufacturer and IS 13311 Part 2. Before testing, the concrete surface must be smooth, dry, and free from loose material, coatings, or carbonated layers. A calibration anvil is used to verify the hammer reading before each survey. Correction factors are applied for testing angles other than horizontal, and additional adjustments account for concrete age, moisture condition, and carbonation depth. NKMPV deploys calibrated Proceq Schmidt hammers for on-site assessment of buildings, bridges, and industrial structures. Our engineers combine rebound hammer results with Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) testing for more reliable strength estimation. For definitive strength verification, we also offer concrete core extraction and compressive testing. We serve structural consultants, PWD departments, and construction companies across Haryana, Punjab, and Himachal Pradesh.

Test Parameters & Acceptance Criteria

The following parameters are recorded and evaluated during rebound hammer testing. Acceptance criteria depend on the project specification, structural design requirements, and the purpose of assessment (quality control vs. strength estimation).

Parameter Value / Range Unit Standard
Rebound Number (R) 10-60 (typical for concrete) IS 13311 Part 2 Cl. 5
Estimated Compressive Strength 10-70 MPa (from correlation curves) MPa IS 13311 Part 2 Cl. 7
Number of Test Points per Location Minimum 12 readings IS 13311 Part 2 Cl. 6.3
Spacing Between Impact Points ≥ 25 mm apart mm IS 13311 Part 2 Cl. 6.2
Permissible Variation from Average Readings differing >6 units from average are discarded IS 13311 Part 2 Cl. 6.3
Calibration Anvil Reading 80 +/- 2 on Proceq anvil Manufacturer specification
Angle Correction Factor Applied for vertical up, vertical down, and inclined positions IS 13311 Part 2 Table 1
Need this test? Request a quote

Applicable Indian Standards

IS 13311 Part 2

Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete — Methods of Test, Part 2: Rebound Hammer

IS 456:2000

Plain and Reinforced Concrete — Code of Practice (Reference for Acceptance Criteria)

BS EN 12504-2

Testing Concrete in Structures — Non-Destructive Testing — Determination of Rebound Number

ASTM C805

Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete

Reference Data

Rebound Number Interpretation and Test Requirements

What a rebound number actually tells you about concrete quality per IS 13311 Part 2, the procedural rules that govern a valid reading, and the conditions that invalidate one.

Average rebound number and concrete quality (IS 13311 Part 2)
Average rebound number Concrete quality
Greater than 40 Very good hard layer
30 to 40 Good layer
20 to 30 Fair
Less than 20 Poor concrete
0 Delaminated

The rebound number characterises the surface layer only — roughly the outer 30 mm. It is an indicator of uniformity and relative quality, not a substitute for a strength determination. Where an absolute strength value is required, IS 456 expects cores.

Procedural requirements for a valid test
Requirement Specification
Readings per test location Minimum 12
Outlier rule Discard readings differing from the average by more than 6 units, then re-average
If more than 5 readings are discarded Discard the entire set and re-test at a different location
Surface condition Smooth, clean, dry; grind trowelled or rough surfaces before testing
Minimum member thickness 100 mm, rigidly held or part of a larger mass
Avoid Positions directly over reinforcement with less than 20 mm cover, honeycombed or wet areas
Hammer orientation Recorded and corrected for — horizontal, vertically up, and vertically down give different values
Calibration Against a test anvil before and after each series of readings

Orientation correction is the most commonly skipped step. The same concrete tested vertically upward and vertically downward can differ by several rebound units, so a report that does not state the hammer orientation cannot be relied on.

When rebound hammer is and is not the right test
Situation Suitable? Better alternative
Comparing uniformity across a large pour Yes -
Screening to locate suspect areas before coring Yes -
Establishing actual in-situ strength for acceptance No Core cutting to IS 516 / IS 456 Cl. 17.4.3
Assessing concrete behind plaster or finishes No Expose the surface, or use UPV
Detecting internal voids or cracking No Ultrasonic pulse velocity to IS 13311 Part 1
Very old or carbonated concrete Caution Carbonated surfaces read artificially high; core to confirm

Pairing rebound hammer with ultrasonic pulse velocity — the combined or SonReb approach — gives a materially better estimate than either alone, because the two respond to different properties. We normally run both where a structural assessment is the objective.

Values are reproduced from the Indian Standards cited against each table and are given for reference. Codes are revised periodically — always confirm against the current edition of the standard, and treat presumptive or indicative figures as a starting point for investigation, never as a substitute for site-specific testing.

Equipment Used

Schmidt Rebound Hammer (N-Type)

Proceq Original Schmidt N

Impact energy 2.207 Nm, rebound scale 10-100, for concrete strength 10-70 MPa

Calibrated

Calibration Anvil

Proceq Standard Steel Anvil

Reference rebound value 80 +/- 2, used for pre-test verification of hammer

Calibrated

Carborundum Stone / Grinding Wheel

Silicon carbide abrasive stone

For smoothing rough concrete surfaces to achieve proper plunger contact

N/A

Carbonation Depth Indicator

Phenolphthalein solution (1% in ethanol)

Indicates carbonation depth on freshly broken concrete surfaces for correction factor application

N/A

Digital Angle Finder

Bosch GAM 220

Measurement range 0-220 degrees, accuracy +/- 0.1 degree, for hammer orientation correction

Calibrated

Testing Process

1

Pre-Survey Planning & Calibration

30-45 minutes

Before mobilising to site, a test grid plan is prepared based on structural drawings identifying beams, columns, slabs, and walls to be tested. On arrival, the Schmidt hammer is verified against the calibration anvil to ensure the rebound reading is within 80 +/- 2. If the reading deviates, the hammer is re-calibrated or replaced before any testing begins.

2

Surface Preparation

10-15 minutes per location

The concrete surface at each test location is cleaned of loose plaster, paint, coatings, oil, or dirt. If the surface is rough or textured, it is smoothed using a carborundum stone or grinding wheel to provide a uniform contact area for the plunger. Wet surfaces are dried. Areas directly over reinforcement bars, voids, or edges (within 20 mm of an edge) are avoided as per IS 13311 Part 2.

3

Rebound Number Measurement

5-10 minutes per location

At each test location, a minimum of 12 impact readings are taken at points spaced at least 25 mm apart. The hammer is held firmly perpendicular to the concrete surface and the plunger is pressed against the surface until the hammer fires. The rebound number is recorded for each impact. The orientation angle of the hammer (horizontal, vertical up, vertical down, or inclined) is noted for correction factor application.

4

Data Screening & Correction

15-20 minutes per structure

From the 12 readings at each location, any reading that deviates by more than 6 units from the average is discarded. The average of the remaining valid readings is calculated. Correction factors are applied for the hammer orientation angle as per IS 13311 Part 2 Table 1. If carbonation is suspected, phenolphthalein testing may be conducted on a small drilled core to determine carbonation depth, and appropriate corrections are applied.

5

Strength Estimation & Correlation

30-45 minutes

The corrected average rebound number is converted to estimated compressive strength using the manufacturer's correlation curves and IS code charts. Where higher accuracy is required, site-specific calibration is performed by correlating rebound numbers with actual core test results from the same structure. For combined assessment, UPV test data is integrated to improve reliability of the strength estimate.

6

Report Generation & Delivery

2-3 hours

A detailed NABL-accredited test report is prepared containing the location plan, individual rebound readings per location, discarded readings with justification, corrected average rebound numbers, estimated compressive strength values, correction factors applied, calibration anvil verification records, and an assessment of concrete quality uniformity. Reports are typically delivered on the same day for standard surveys.

Where This Test Is Used

The rebound hammer test is indispensable for rapid, non-destructive assessment of concrete quality in existing structures. It is extensively used during bridge inspection and load testing programmes to screen concrete condition before detailed structural analysis. For buildings and industrial structures, it provides a quick uniformity check — identifying weaker zones that may require core cutting and extraction for definitive strength verification. Combined with the UPV test, the rebound hammer forms part of the SONREB (SON = sonic, REB = rebound) combined method, which significantly improves the accuracy of non-destructive strength estimation. NKMPV routinely deploys this test for post-fire damage assessment, structural audit of ageing buildings, and quality control during new construction.
Concrete quality uniformity assessment in buildings and structures Pre-screening of concrete strength before core extraction Post-fire and post-earthquake structural damage assessment Quality control during new construction — verifying in-situ vs. design strength Bridge pier and deck concrete condition survey per IRC SP 51 Structural audit of ageing residential and commercial buildings Dispute resolution — evidence of concrete quality for legal and arbitration cases Comparative quality mapping across different pours or contractors

Detailed Information

Rebound Hammer Test: A Comprehensive Report

The rebound hammer test is a widely recognized non-destructive testing (NDT) technique used to evaluate the surface hardness and estimate the compressive strength of concrete structures. Its origins date back to the mid-20th century, when it was introduced by Ernst Schmidt, a pioneer in concrete testing methods. Since its inception, the rebound hammer, also known as the Schmidt hammer, has been instrumental in shaping the field of concrete assessment due to its simplicity, affordability, and effectiveness. Concrete is one of the most extensively used construction materials worldwide, known for its durability and compressive strength. However, ensuring the quality and strength of concrete structures is a critical aspect of civil engineering. Traditional methods of testing concrete strength, such as core sampling, are destructive, time-consuming, and often expensive. The rebound hammer test addresses these challenges by providing a quick, non-invasive, and cost-effective alternative for assessing concrete properties in situ. The principle behind the rebound hammer test is straightforward yet ingenious. The device measures the rebound of a spring-loaded hammer when it strikes a concrete surface. This rebound, or rebound number, is correlated with the concrete's surface hardness and, subsequently, its compressive strength. The ability to perform this test without causing damage to the structure makes it particularly valuable for routine inspections, structural evaluations, and quality control during construction. This report delves into the various aspects of the rebound hammer test, including its underlying principles, procedural steps, influencing factors, and applications. It also highlights the benefits and limitations of the test, discusses recent technological advancements, and provides insights into its integration with other testing methods for comprehensive concrete assessment. By adhering to standardized practices and leveraging modern innovations, the rebound hammer test continues to play a pivotal role in ensuring the safety, durability, and performance of concrete structures. Principle of the Rebound Hammer Test The rebound hammer test works on the principle of surface hardness. When the hammer strikes the surface of the concrete, the rebound distance of the plunger depends on the surface hardness of the concrete. The rebound number, also known as the rebound index, is directly proportional to the compressive strength of the concrete. This principle allows engineers to estimate the concrete's strength quickly without causing damage.

Objectives of the Rebound Hammer Test

The rebound hammer test is employed with several specific objectives in mind. These objectives are crucial in ensuring the reliability, safety, and efficiency of concrete structures across various applications:
  1. Estimation of Compressive Strength:
  • The primary objective of the rebound hammer test is to provide a rapid estimation of the in-situ compressive strength of concrete. This is particularly useful in assessing whether a structure meets design specifications and quality standards.
    1. Assessment of Uniformity:
  • The test is used to determine the uniformity of concrete within a structure. By conducting multiple readings across different sections, engineers can identify variations in material properties, helping to detect inconsistencies or potential defects.
    1. Evaluation of Surface Hardness:
  • The rebound hammer test measures surface hardness, which is an indirect indicator of the concrete's strength and durability. This is especially useful in assessing wear and abrasion resistance in high-traffic areas.
    1. Preliminary Investigation of Defects:
  • The test helps in the preliminary identification of defects, such as weak zones, honeycombing, or delamination, which may compromise structural integrity. Early detection facilitates timely interventions and repairs.
    1. Quality Control during Construction:
  • During the construction phase, the rebound hammer test is used as a quality control tool to ensure that the concrete meets the required standards before proceeding to subsequent stages of construction.
    1. Performance Monitoring of Existing Structures:
  • For existing structures, the rebound hammer test serves as a diagnostic tool to monitor performance over time, assess aging or degradation, and plan maintenance activities.
    1. Decision-Making for Retrofitting or Demolition:
  • In cases where structures exhibit signs of distress, the test provides critical data for deciding whether retrofitting, strengthening, or demolition is necessary.
    1. Support for Research and Development:
  • The rebound hammer test is widely used in research to study the behavior of different concrete mixes, additives, and curing conditions, contributing to advancements in construction materials and methods.
    1. Non-Destructive Evaluation of Heritage Structures:
  • For historic and culturally significant structures, the test enables engineers to evaluate the condition of concrete without causing damage, ensuring preservation and sustainability.
    1. Cost-Effective Preliminary Assessments:
  • As a quick and economical method, the rebound hammer test is often used in preliminary assessments to identify areas that may require more detailed and invasive testing methods.
By addressing these objectives, the rebound hammer test plays a vital role in maintaining the safety, functionality, and longevity of concrete structures while optimizing resources and minimizing disruptions. Apparatus Used The primary apparatus used in the rebound hammer test is the rebound hammer itself, which consists of the following components:
  • Outer Body:A cylindrical housing that contains the internal components and protects the mechanism.
  • Plunger:A spring-loaded rod that strikes the concrete surface to measure the rebound.
  • Spring Mechanism:Provides the required force for the plunger to strike the surface.
  • Rebound Scale:Measures the rebound distance and displays it as a numerical value on the scale.
  • Calibration Settings:Allow adjustments to ensure accurate readings and consistency.
Procedure of the Rebound Hammer Test The rebound hammer test is conducted using a systematic procedure to ensure reliable and accurate results:
  1. Preparation of the Surface:
  • Clean the test surface to remove dirt, grease, or loose particles.
  • Avoid testing near edges or corners, maintaining a distance of at least 20 mm to prevent errors caused by boundary effects.
    1. Calibration of the Rebound Hammer:
  • Calibrate the rebound hammer using the calibration anvil provided by the manufacturer. This step ensures that the device provides accurate readings.
    1. Test Execution:
  • Hold the hammer perpendicular to the test surface to ensure a consistent strike angle.
  • Press the plunger against the surface with steady pressure until it triggers the spring mechanism.
  • Record the rebound number displayed on the scale immediately after the strike.
    1. Multiple Readings:
  • Perform at least 10 readings in a single test area to account for variability in the material.
  • Discard any anomalous readings and compute the average rebound number for that area.
    1. Conversion to Compressive Strength:
  • Use the manufacturer-provided correlation chart to convert the average rebound number into an estimated compressive strength value. This step ensures that the results are aligned with standard practices.
Factors Influencing Rebound Hammer Test Results Several factors can influence the accuracy and reliability of the rebound hammer test results. Understanding these factors is critical for interpreting the data correctly:
  1. Concrete Surface Condition:
  • Smooth and polished surfaces tend to yield higher rebound numbers compared to rough or textured surfaces. Proper surface preparation minimizes discrepancies.
    1. Moisture Content:
  • Wet or saturated concrete surfaces can result in lower rebound numbers due to reduced surface stiffness.
    1. Age of Concrete:
  • The compressive strength of concrete increases with age. Thus, rebound numbers from freshly cast concrete may differ from older structures.
    1. Carbonation:
  • Carbonation on the concrete surface increases hardness, leading to higher rebound numbers. Special care is needed to account for this effect.
    1. Type of Aggregate and Mix Design:
  • Variations in aggregate types and concrete mix proportions can affect the correlation between rebound numbers and compressive strength.
    1. Orientation of the Test Surface:
  • Horizontal and vertical surfaces may yield different rebound numbers due to gravitational effects and positioning.
Interpretation of Results The rebound number is interpreted using correlation charts provided by the rebound hammer manufacturer. These charts are derived from extensive laboratory testing and correlate rebound numbers to the compressive strength of concrete. It is important to:
  • Use charts specific to the rebound hammer model and test conditions.
  • Consider environmental factors and material variability when interpreting results.
  • Combine the rebound hammer test with other methods, such as ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) or core sampling, for comprehensive assessment.
Standards and Code References Several international and national standards govern the rebound hammer test to ensure uniformity, reliability, and accuracy. Key standards include:
  1. ASTM C805/C805M-18:
  • Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete.
    1. IS 13311 (Part 2): 1992:
  • Indian Standard for Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete - Methods of Test (Rebound Hammer).
    1. BS EN 12504-2:2012:
  • Testing Concrete in Structures - Non-Destructive Testing - Determination of Rebound Number.
    1. ACI 228.1R-03:
  • In-Place Methods to Estimate Concrete Strength.
These standards provide guidelines for test procedures, result interpretation, and quality control.

Benefits of the Rebound Hammer Test

The rebound hammer test offers several advantages, making it a preferred method for preliminary concrete assessment:
  1. Non-Destructive:
  • The test does not cause any damage to the structure, preserving its integrity.
    1. Quick and Simple:
  • The procedure is straightforward and provides immediate results, saving time during site inspections.
    1. Cost-Effective:
  • It is more economical compared to destructive methods that require sample extraction and laboratory testing.
    1. Portable:
  • The rebound hammer is lightweight and easy to carry, making it suitable for field applications.
    1. Preliminary Assessment:
  • The test serves as a useful preliminary tool for identifying areas that require further investigation.
    1. Wide Applicability:
  • Can be employed in various scenarios, from routine inspections to large-scale projects.
    1. Real-Time Feedback:
  • Provides on-the-spot data for making immediate decisions regarding the condition of concrete.
    1. Minimal Training Requirements:
  • Operators require minimal training to conduct the test, ensuring broad usability across diverse teams.
    1. Enhances Preventive Maintenance:
  • Regular testing can identify potential issues early, reducing long-term repair costs and extending the lifespan of structures.
Limitations of the Rebound Hammer Test Despite its advantages, the rebound hammer test has some limitations:
  1. Surface Sensitivity:
  • Results are heavily influenced by surface conditions, requiring meticulous preparation.
    1. Limited Depth Assessment:
  • The test assesses only the surface hardness and does not provide information about the internal properties of the concrete.
    1. Calibration Dependency:
  • Regular calibration is necessary to maintain accuracy, which may not always be feasible on-site.
    1. Environmental Influence:
  • Factors such as temperature, humidity, and carbonation can significantly impact test results.
    1. Empirical Nature:
  • The test relies on correlation charts, which may not account for all variables present in real-world conditions.

Applications of the Rebound Hammer Test

The rebound hammer test has diverse applications in the field of civil engineering and construction:
  1. Quality Control:
  • Ensures uniformity and consistency in concrete properties during construction projects.
    1. Structural Assessment:
  • Evaluates the condition of existing structures for maintenance, repairs, or retrofitting.
    1. Safety Inspections:
  • Identifies weak or deteriorated areas in concrete structures, ensuring safety and durability.
    1. Research and Development:
  • Provides valuable data for studying the performance of different concrete mixes and materials.
    1. Heritage Conservation:
  • Assesses the condition of historic concrete structures without causing damage, aiding in preservation efforts.
Comparison with Other Non-Destructive Testing Methods
Aspect Rebound Hammer Test Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) Core Sampling
Principle Surface hardness Wave propagation velocity Direct sampling
Cost Low Moderate High
Speed Fast Moderate Slow
Damage None None Partial
Depth of Analysis Surface only Up to full depth Full depth
Reliability Moderate High Very high
Case Studies
  1. Bridge Assessment in Urban Areas
A rebound hammer test was conducted on an aging urban bridge to evaluate the surface condition of its concrete deck. The results highlighted areas with low rebound numbers, indicating weaker zones that required immediate repair.
  1. Heritage Building Restoration
In a heritage conservation project, the rebound hammer test provided critical data for assessing the condition of century-old concrete structures without causing any damage. Recent Advancements in Rebound Hammer Testing Technological advancements have enhanced the reliability and utility of the rebound hammer test:
  1. Digital Rebound Hammers:
  • Incorporate digital displays, data storage, and analysis tools for improved accuracy and efficiency.
    1. Integration with IoT:
  • Enables remote monitoring, real-time data sharing, and predictive analytics for better decision-making.
    1. Enhanced Correlation Models:
  • Machine learning algorithms improve the accuracy of strength predictions by considering multiple variables.
    1. Automated Testing Systems:
  • Reduces human error, enhances repeatability, and increases test reliability.
Conclusion The rebound hammer test remains a valuable tool in the field of civil engineering, offering a quick, economical, and non-destructive method for assessing the quality and strength of concrete. Its ability to provide immediate insights without compromising structural integrity makes it an indispensable part of modern construction and maintenance practices. The limitations of the test, such as surface sensitivity and dependency on correlation charts, can be mitigated by proper training, calibration, and supplementary testing methods. Furthermore, technological advancements, including digital integration and enhanced correlation models, have significantly improved the test’s reliability and scope. The test is particularly crucial for infrastructure projects where time, cost, and non-destructive methods are of essence. By adhering to standardized procedures and leveraging recent innovations, engineers can confidently rely on the rebound hammer test for a wide range of applications, from routine quality control to complex structural assessments. As the construction industry continues to evolve, the rebound hammer test will remain a cornerstone of non-destructive testing, ensuring safety, durability, and efficiency in concrete construction and maintenance. References:
  1. ASTM C805/C805M-18
  2. IS 13311 (Part 2): 1992
  3. BS EN 12504-2:2012
  4. ACI 228.1R-03
  5. Manufacturer manuals and correlation charts

Why Choose NKMPV for Rebound Hammer Testing?

NABL Accredited Reports

Our rebound hammer test reports carry NABL accreditation under ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and are accepted by NHAI, state PWDs, municipal corporations, courts, and arbitration tribunals without additional verification.

Proceq Calibrated Instruments

We use genuine Proceq Original Schmidt N-type hammers, verified against calibration anvils before every survey. Regular factory calibration ensures reading accuracy within manufacturer-specified tolerances.

Combined NDT Assessment

Our engineers combine rebound hammer data with UPV test results (SONREB method) to provide significantly more reliable strength estimates than either test alone — reducing the need for costly and disruptive core extraction.

Same-Day Results for Standard Surveys

For routine building and bridge surveys, our team completes on-site testing and delivers the NABL-certified report within the same working day, enabling fast decision-making on project timelines.

Experienced Structural Assessment Team

Our NDT engineers have assessed hundreds of structures including highway bridges, multi-storey buildings, industrial chimneys, and water tanks across Haryana, Punjab, and Himachal Pradesh.

Frequently Asked Questions

The rebound hammer test uses a spring-loaded steel hammer that strikes the concrete surface through a plunger. The rebound distance is measured as a 'rebound number' on a scale of 10-60 for typical concrete. This rebound number is correlated to compressive strength using manufacturer charts and IS 13311 Part 2. The principle is that harder, stronger concrete produces a higher rebound. However, the test gives an estimated strength, not an exact value — accuracy is typically +/- 25% unless site-specific calibration with core tests is performed.
IS 13311 Part 2 (Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete — Methods of Test, Part 2: Rebound Hammer) is the governing Indian standard. It specifies the procedure for surface preparation, number of readings, data screening criteria, angle correction factors, and reporting requirements. The companion standard IS 13311 Part 1 covers Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity testing, and IS 456:2000 provides the structural acceptance framework.
As per IS 13311 Part 2, a minimum of 12 individual impact readings must be taken at each test location, with impact points spaced at least 25 mm apart. Readings that differ by more than 6 units from the average are discarded. At least 9 valid readings must remain after screening; otherwise, the test at that location must be repeated. For a comprehensive structural survey, multiple locations are tested on each structural element.
Several factors influence accuracy: surface moisture (wet concrete gives lower rebound by 10-20%), carbonation (carbonated surface layers give falsely high readings), age of concrete (correlation curves are typically calibrated for 28-day concrete), aggregate type (lightweight aggregates give lower rebound), surface texture (rough surfaces reduce rebound), and hammer orientation (gravity affects rebound in vertical positions). Correction factors for angle and moisture are applied per IS 13311 Part 2.
No. The rebound hammer test provides an estimated compressive strength with an accuracy of approximately +/- 25%. It is classified as a quality assessment tool, not a definitive strength determination method. For structural adequacy decisions, dispute resolution, or when rebound hammer results indicate suspect concrete, core extraction and crushing per IS 516 remains the definitive method. The rebound hammer is best used as a screening tool to identify areas that warrant further investigation.
The cost depends on the number of test locations, site accessibility, and whether combined NDT (rebound hammer + UPV) is required. NKMPV offers competitive per-location rates for standard building and bridge surveys, with volume discounts for large projects. Contact us at +91-82953-60108 for a project-specific quotation. A typical residential building survey covering 20-30 locations can be completed within a single day.

The rebound hammer test procedure per IS 13311 Part 2:1992: (1) Surface preparation — grind a 30 cm × 30 cm test area to remove plaster, paint, and laitance; the surface must be smooth, clean, and dry. (2) Hammer calibration — verify against the calibration anvil before testing (rebound 80 ± 2); recalibrate if outside tolerance. (3) Test orientation — hold the hammer perpendicular to the surface (horizontal, vertically up, vertically down — apply orientation correction factor from the hammer chart). (4) Take 10–15 readings per test area, each at least 25 mm from another reading. (5) Discard outliers beyond ±20% of the mean. (6) Compute the average rebound number (R), then convert to estimated compressive strength using the hammer's calibration curve, corrected for orientation, age, and aggregate type. (7) Cross-verify with at least one core sample per 50 m² of structure for reliability.

Typical rebound numbers correlating to design grade (horizontal orientation, mature concrete, normal aggregate): M20: R = 24–30, M25: R = 28–34, M30: R = 32–38, M35: R = 36–42, M40: R = 40–46, M45: R = 44–50. These are indicative for standard hammers; site-specific calibration against core samples is required for forensic-quality assessment. IS 13311 Part 2 explicitly states the rebound hammer is for indicative strength assessment only — for design-grade verification, pair with UPV (IS 13311 Part 1) and core extraction.

No — the rebound hammer test is non-destructive (NDT). The 0.225 Nm impact from the standard Schmidt-type hammer leaves a barely visible indentation (typically <0.5 mm diameter) that does not affect structural integrity. This makes it ideal for: (1) rapid in-situ quality verification during construction without affecting concrete strength, (2) condition assessment of existing structures where coring would damage critical members, and (3) screening surveys across large structures to identify weak zones for follow-up testing. The non-destructive nature also means no traffic closure is required for bridge and pavement testing.

The two NDT methods complement each other: Rebound hammer measures surface hardness which correlates to compressive strength but only at the top 20–30 mm of concrete; affected by surface carbonation, dampness, and finishing. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) measures through-thickness wave velocity which correlates to concrete uniformity, density, and internal voids — independent of surface condition. Best practice per IS 13311: use both in combination — rebound for surface strength estimate, UPV for internal quality. The combined assessment is far more reliable than either alone. See our UPV test service for the complementary internal-quality test.

Coverage

Rebound Hammer Test Across India

Wherever your project is, there are two ways to work with NKMPV on Rebound Hammer Test.

Standard IS 13311 Part 2
Field work On site, across India
Laboratory Pinjore, Haryana
Service area Pan-India

Our team travels to your site

For field work, our engineers and instruments mobilise anywhere in India — highway corridors, bridges, plants and greenfield alignments included.

Or courier samples to our lab

Distance is not a constraint for laboratory testing. Send samples to our Pinjore laboratory and receive the digital report on completion — the route most of our out-of-region clients use.

Where NKMPV has delivered projects

  • Chandigarh
  • Panchkula
  • Mohali
  • Ambala
  • Karnal
  • Kurukshetra
  • Yamunanagar
  • Hisar
  • Gurugram
  • Faridabad
  • Ludhiana
  • Jalandhar
  • Patiala
  • Shimla
  • Solan
  • Haryana
  • Punjab
  • Himachal Pradesh

These are locations where we have completed projects — not the boundary of our service area. We mobilise across India on request. See full coverage & project locations →

Which standards does NKMPV follow for Rebound Hammer Test?

Rebound Hammer Test is carried out to IS 13311 Part 2, IS 456:2000, BS EN 12504-2 and ASTM C805, as listed in the Applicable Standards section of this page. Tell us the specification your project must comply with and the quotation will state the standard the work follows.

Is there a Rebound Hammer Test lab near me?

Our laboratory is at Pinjore, Haryana, within same-day reach of Chandigarh, Panchkula, Mohali, Ambala and the wider Tri-City. If you are further away, distance is not a constraint: our field team travels to site anywhere in India for on-site work, and for laboratory tests you can courier samples to the Pinjore lab and receive the report digitally. Clients across Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi-NCR, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh already work with us this way.

Do you carry out Rebound Hammer Test outside your home region?

Yes. NKMPV operates pan-India. We have delivered projects across Chandigarh, Panchkula, Mohali, Ambala, Karnal, Kurukshetra, Yamunanagar, Hisar and beyond, and we mobilise to greenfield and remote corridors on request. The 18 locations listed on our site are the places we have already worked — not the limit of where we go.

How do I book Rebound Hammer Test and what does it cost?

Send us the project details — location, quantity, and the standard you need to comply with — and you get a written quotation, usually within one working day. Pricing depends on sample count, site access and mobilisation distance, so we quote per project rather than publishing a fixed rate. Call +91-82953-60108 or use the quote form; every quotation states the applicable IS/IRC standard.

Need Rebound Hammer Test for your project?

Get a written quotation Call +91-82953-60108

Related Testing Services

Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) Test

Concrete quality and uniformity assessment by ultrasonic wave propagation per IS 13311 Part 1.

Learn More →

Concrete Core and Concrete Cube Testing

Compressive strength testing of cubes and drilled cores per IS 516 and IS 456.

Learn More →

Bridge Load Test

Structural load testing and deflection measurement of bridges per IRC SP 51 and IRC 112.

Learn More →

Core Cutting of Asphalt Pavements and Concrete

Diamond core extraction for thickness verification and density testing per ASTM D3549/IS 5816.

Learn More →

Need Rebound Hammer Testing? Get a Quote Today.

+91-82953-60108
Request a Quote
Call Get a quote