Runway Pavement Evaluation
PCN determination, structural assessment, and overlay design for airfield pavements
What are PCN and ACN in runway evaluation?
PCN (Pavement Classification Number) expresses a runway pavement's load-bearing capacity, and ACN (Aircraft Classification Number) expresses an aircraft's demand; an aircraft can operate if its ACN does not exceed the pavement PCN. Evaluation follows ICAO guidance using FWD data. NKMPV performs runway pavement evaluation with NABL-accredited reporting.
Runway Pavement Evaluation is a comprehensive structural and functional assessment of airfield pavements — runways, taxiways, and aprons — to determine their load-carrying capacity expressed as a Pavement Classification Number (PCN). The PCN is compared against the Aircraft Classification Number (ACN) of operating aircraft to ensure safe operations.
What Is Runway Pavement Evaluation?
Evaluation Parameters & Criteria
The following parameters are determined during a comprehensive runway pavement evaluation. Acceptance criteria are governed by ICAO Annex 14, FAA standards, and DGCA Civil Aviation Requirements.
| Parameter | Value / Range | Unit | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pavement Classification Number (PCN) | Reported as PCN/Pavement Type/Subgrade Category/Tyre Pressure/Evaluation Method | ICAO Annex 14 Ch. 2 | |
| FWD Centre Deflection (D0) | 50-800 microns (varies by pavement type) | microns | FAA AC 150/5370-11B |
| Subgrade Modulus (back-calculated) | 20-150 MPa (typical range) | MPa | FAA AC 150/5320-6 |
| Pavement Condition Index (PCI) | 0-100 scale (Good: 70-100, Fair: 40-69, Poor: 0-39) | ASTM D5340 | |
| Surface Friction (Mu Value) | ≥ 0.50 (new surface), ≥ 0.40 (maintenance planning) | ICAO Annex 14 Cl. 3.4 | |
| Rubber Deposit Assessment | Visual rating 1-5 scale at touchdown zones | ICAO Annex 14 / FAA AC 150/5320-12 | |
| Remaining Structural Life | Expressed in years or cumulative aircraft departures | years | FAA AC 150/5320-6 |
Applicable Standards & Regulations
Aerodrome Design and Operations — Chapter 2 (Aerodrome Data) and Chapter 3 (Physical Characteristics)
Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation (Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular)
Directorate General of Civil Aviation — Civil Aviation Requirements for Aerodrome Standards
Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys
Use of Nondestructive Testing in the Evaluation of Airport Pavements
Airport Services Manual — Pavement Surface Conditions
Equipment Used
Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD)
Dynatest 8002 / KUAB 150
Load range 7-120 kN, 9-sensor deflection array, simulates aircraft wheel loads at 300 mm plate diameter
CalibratedFWD Geophone Sensors
Dynatest 9-sensor array
Radial offsets at 0, 200, 300, 450, 600, 900, 1200, 1500, 1800 mm from load centre for full deflection basin capture
CalibratedCore Drilling Machine
Hilti DD 200 / DD 350
100-150 mm diameter cores through bituminous and cement concrete layers for thickness verification and material testing
CalibratedDynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)
Standard DCP per ASTM D6951
Subgrade strength assessment in cored holes, correlated to CBR for PCN back-calculation
CalibratedGPS / DGPS Rover
Trimble R8s
Geotagging of FWD test points, PCI survey sections, and distress locations with centimetre-level accuracy
CalibratedPavement Analysis Software
BAKFAA / ELMOD / FAARFIELD
FWD deflection back-calculation, layer moduli determination, PCN computation, overlay thickness design per FAA methodology
CalibratedEvaluation Process
Project Scoping & Airside Access Coordination
3-5 DaysThe evaluation scope is defined in consultation with the airport operator or AAI (Airports Authority of India), covering the runway, taxiway, and apron sections to be assessed. Airside access permits and security clearances are obtained. A testing schedule is coordinated with ATC (Air Traffic Control) to identify available windows — typically at night or during low-traffic periods — when the runway can be closed for FWD testing and coring. Historical pavement records, construction drawings, and previous evaluation reports are collected.
Visual Distress Survey (PCI Assessment)
2-4 DaysThe pavement surface is divided into sample units per ASTM D5340, and each unit is inspected for surface distresses — cracking (longitudinal, transverse, alligator, block), rutting, ravelling, patching, bleeding, weathering, joint faulting (for rigid pavements), and FOD potential. Each distress type is measured and rated for severity (low, medium, high) and extent. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is calculated for each sample unit and an area-weighted PCI is determined for the entire feature. Rubber deposit accumulation in the touchdown zone is also assessed.
Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Testing
1-3 Nights (during runway closure)FWD testing is conducted during the approved runway closure window. The FWD applies a dynamic impulse load (40-70 kN for flexible pavements, 70-120 kN for rigid pavements) through a 300 mm loading plate, simulating an aircraft wheel load. Deflection is recorded by 9 geophones at prescribed radial offsets. Tests are conducted at 25-50 metre intervals along the runway centreline and at the wheel track offset positions. Pavement surface temperature and air temperature are recorded at each test point for temperature correction.
Core Sampling & Subgrade Investigation
1-2 DaysPavement cores (100-150 mm diameter) are extracted at representative locations to verify layer thicknesses and material types against as-built records. Core samples are tested for bituminous content, density, and compressive strength in the laboratory. In the cored holes, a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) is used to assess subgrade strength, which is correlated to <a href='/services/cbr-test'>CBR values</a> for back-calculation input. Cores are patched immediately with cold mix to maintain runway operability.
FWD Data Analysis & Back-Calculation
3-5 DaysFWD deflection data is temperature-corrected to a standard reference temperature (typically 35 degrees C for India). Using software such as BAKFAA or ELMOD, the deflection basins are back-calculated to determine the elastic moduli of each pavement layer and the subgrade. The back-calculated moduli are compared with typical design values. Structural capacity is assessed by computing the allowable aircraft load repetitions using FAARFIELD or equivalent software. The PCN is determined using the technical evaluation method (T) based on back-calculated layer properties.
PCN Determination & Overlay Design
3-5 DaysThe PCN is computed and reported in the ICAO standard format: PCN value / pavement type (R for rigid, F for flexible) / subgrade category (A-D) / maximum tyre pressure category (W-Z) / evaluation method (T for technical, U for using aircraft). Where the existing PCN is insufficient for the design aircraft fleet, overlay thickness is designed using FAA AC 150/5320-6 methodology. For <a href='/services/rigid-pavement-design'>rigid pavements</a>, slab replacement or unbonded overlay options are analysed. Remaining structural life is estimated in years and cumulative departures.
Report Compilation & Submission
5-7 DaysThe final evaluation report includes: executive summary, pavement inventory and history, PCI survey results with distress maps, FWD testing data with deflection basin plots, back-calculation results, PCN determination with full ICAO notation, remaining structural life analysis, friction test results (if conducted), overlay design recommendations with cost estimates, and a prioritised maintenance and rehabilitation plan. The report is formatted for submission to DGCA and AAI as required for aerodrome certification.
Where Runway Pavement Evaluation Is Applied
Why Choose NKMPV for Runway Pavement Evaluation?
NABL Accredited Testing
Our FWD testing and laboratory analysis carry NABL accreditation (ISO/IEC 17025:2017), ensuring that PCN values and material test results are accepted by DGCA, AAI, and defence authorities without additional verification.
Airfield-Experienced Team
Our engineers understand the unique constraints of airfield work — limited access windows, ATC coordination, FOD prevention protocols, and DGCA reporting requirements. We have evaluated pavements at regional airports and defence airfields across northern India.
Complete Evaluation Capability
NKMPV handles every component of runway evaluation in-house: FWD testing, core extraction, laboratory material testing (CBR, density, bitumen content), PCI survey, back-calculation, PCN determination, and overlay design — eliminating the need for multiple subcontractors.
FAA-Standard Analysis Software
We use industry-standard software — BAKFAA for deflection back-calculation, FAARFIELD for pavement design and life estimation, and PAVER for PCI computation — ensuring our analysis meets international standards accepted worldwide.
Actionable Recommendations
Our reports go beyond stating a PCN number. We provide remaining life estimates, prioritised maintenance schedules, overlay design alternatives with cost comparisons, and construction staging recommendations that airport operators can translate directly into capital expenditure plans.
Frequently Asked Questions
PCN (Pavement Classification Number) is the ICAO-standard rating of an airport pavement's load-bearing capacity, expressed as a 5-character code: PCN_value/Type/Sub-grade_strength/Tyre_pressure/Method. Example: 60/F/B/W/T = PCN 60, Flexible pavement, sub-grade strength category B (medium), Tyre pressure unlimited W (high), Technical evaluation method T. Calculation per ICAO Annex 14 and DGCA CAR Section 4 Series B Part I: based on the maximum permissible aircraft load × allowable departures over the pavement life, derived from layered elastic analysis using FWD-measured layer moduli. Aircraft PCN must equal or be less than pavement PCN for unrestricted operation.
Per DGCA CAR Section 4 Series B Part I and ICAO Annex 14, a complete runway pavement evaluation requires: (1) FWD testing at 50-100 m intervals along runway centerline and at touchdown zones — to derive layer moduli per IRC 115 / ASTM D4694. (2) Coring at 5-10 representative locations — to verify layer thicknesses and material properties. (3) Sub-grade CBR or k-value — from existing records or fresh testing per IS 2720 / IS 9214. (4) NSV survey for runway roughness (IRI), rutting, cracking. (5) Skid resistance / friction testing per FAA AC 150/5320-12. (6) Drainage and macrotexture assessment for rubber-deposit removal planning. NKMPV provides the complete runway evaluation suite as a single integrated deliverable for AAI, IAF, and private airport operators.
Loading regime: aircraft impose concentrated wheel loads (B777 main gear ~ 27 tonnes per wheel) but at lower frequency (50-500 departures/day) vs highway trucks (8-11 tonnes per axle, >10,000/day on NH). Tyre pressure: aircraft 1.0-1.7 MPa vs highway truck 0.6-0.8 MPa — affecting surface texture wear. Geometry: runways are straight long segments; testing density per length is comparable to highways but touchdown zones (first 600 m) need denser testing. Distress modes: airport pavements show concentrated rutting in wheel paths, FOD (foreign-object damage) susceptibility, rubber deposits in touchdown zones, and fuel-spill softening. Acceptance standards: ICAO/DGCA for airports vs MoRTH/IRC for highways. NKMPV's runway evaluation capability extends our standard FWD service with airport-specific procedures.